Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 01:03

Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
How do you confront your own family for not inviting you or leaving you out of things?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Image of giant volcano on Mars captured by NASA orbiter - ABC News
Russia can stop this any time.
Just in the last 5 years:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Why do people have polyamorous relationships?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Why would a person always be so tired?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
I gave Google’s AI Mode a shot, but I’m still sticking with Perplexity - Android Authority
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Thank you.
Kristin Davis Set The Record Straight On Whether She Dated Chris Noth - BuzzFeed
What’s next?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.